https://www.ucda.com/spark/
Spark – The UCDA Design Education Journal
Spark—the UCDA design education journal—invites submissions that heighten and expand the understanding and practice of design and design education in the past, present, or future.
Spark Issues
Spark: Volume 1, Issue 1, 2024 (PDF Download) ©2024 The University and College Design Association [UCDA]. All rights reserved. SPARK. Format: Online. ISSN: 3065-7911
|
|
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Submissions are accepted on a rolling basis and reviewed for the upcoming issue. Submissions must not have been previously published in print or online, although articles that expand research from previously published material are welcome. |
|
SUBMIT AN ARTICLE Volume 2, Issue 1: Call for Entries Open Now: Beginning November 2024. Estimated publishing date: Spring 2025. |
EDITORIAL BOARD
CHIEF EDITOR Kyra Whitehead, Wenzhou-Kean University [About the Editor]
Susan Matherne, UCDA Executive Director
DESK REVIEW COMMITTEE
Michael Clayton, University of the Incarnate Word
Kelly MacArthur Salchow, Michigan State University
Sheri Selph, Middle Tennessee State University
Johnathon Strube, East Tennessee State University
PEER REVIEW COMMITTEE
Guenet Abraham, University of Maryland Baltimore County
Anne Beekman, Findlay University
Peter Bella, University of Central Arkansas
Lyn Brands, Arkansas Tech University
Calee Cecconi, University of Wisconsin—Stout
Christopher Cote, University of Tennessee Knoxville
Stephanie Cunningham, Florida Atlantic University
Laura Franz, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
Nikhil Ghodke, Auburn University at Montgomery
Samantha Herbert, Auburn University
Anne Jordan, Rochester Institute of Technology
Kimberly Mitchell, University of Tennessee Knoxville
Chiranjeevi Rahul Rollakanti, Middle East College
Christina Singer, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
John Smith, Chicago State University
Christopher St. Cyr, Delaware College of Art & Design
PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Reviews for Spark—the UCDA Design Edcuation Journal are double-blind. Identities of the reviewer and author are concealed from each other. Double-blind reviews are considered of high-quality for tenure and promotion committees.